Salvation Depends Upon Our Choice of State in Life (Vocation) – I


Feast of the Presentation of the Blessed Virgin Mary

How lovely are Thy tabernacles, O Lord of hosts!
My soul longeth and fainteth for the courts of the Lord….
Blessed are they that dwell in Thy house, O Lord:
they shall praise Thee for ever and ever
(Ps. 84.1,5)

“We ought to conform to the designs of God in the choice of a State of Life, whatever it may be….”

(St. Alphonsus Mary Liguori)

… It is evident that our eternal salvation depends principally upon the choice of our state of life. [the Venerable] Father Granada, OP [a spiritual master in the time of our holy Mother Teresa of Jesus] calls this choice the chief wheel of our whole life. Hence, as when in a clock, the chief wheel is deranged, the whole clock is also deranged, so in the order of our salvation, if we make a mistake as to the state to which we are called, our whole life, as St. Gregory Nazanzien says, will be an error.

If, then, in the choice of a state of life, we wish to secure our eternal salvation, we must embrace that to which God calls us, in which only God prepares for us the efficacious means necessary to our salvation. For, as St. Cyprian says,: “The grace of the Holy Ghost is given according to the order of God, and not according to our own will;” and therefore St. Paul the Apostle writes, Every one hath his proper gift from God (1 Cor. 7.7). That is, as Cornelius a Lapide explains it, God gives to every one his vocation and chooses the state in which He wills to be saved. And this is the order of predestination described by the same apostle: Whom He predestinated, them He also called; and whom He called, them He also justified, …. and them He also glorified (Rom. 8.30). [In another work, this same great Bishop and Doctor of the Church explains himself in these words: "God wills that all men should be saved, but not in the same way. As in heaven He has distinguished different degrees of glory, so on earth He has established different states of life, as to many different ways of gaining heaven. The choice is not arbitary: "To enter into any state of life, a divine vocation is necessary; for without such a vocation it is, if not impossible, at least most difficult to fulfill the obligations of our state, and obtain salvation." The reason of this is evident; for it is God Who in the order of His Providence assigns to each one of us his state of life and afterwards provides us with the graces and the help suitable to the state to which He calls us. We ought to be persuaded and ought never to forget that from all eternity God thinks with love of each one of us, just as a good father thinks of his only son - the editor of the Saint's work.]

We must remark that in this world this doctrine of the vocation is not much studied by some persons [the Novus Ordo of Vatican II scorns this as ‘obsolete’ and rather teaches just exactly what is the opposite – hence the perversion of so many young men and women who have come to dwell in what originally is the house of the Lord but now has become a filthy den for dragons - My tabernacle is laid waste… My children are gone out from Me… Because the pastors have done foolishly… to make the cities of Juda a desert, and a dwelling for dragons (Jer. 10.20,21,22): O God, the heathens are come into Thy inheritance, they have defiled Thy holy temple: they have made Jerusalem as a place to keep fruit (Ps. 78.1) – Vocations to the religious life and the priesthood, beware of Vatican II ‘modern seminaries, monasteries, convents’; cf., our post “The Year 1929” on the infiltrators of the Synagogue of Satan (Apoc. 2.9; 3.9) in ecclesiastical and religious trappings in command of the ‘official’ hierarchy]. They think it to be all the same, whether they live in the state to which God calls them, or in that which they choose of their own inclinations, and therefore so many live a bad life and damn themselves.

But it is certain that this is the principal point with regard to the acquisition of eternal life. He who disturbs this order and breaks this chain of salvation will not be saved. With all his labors and with all the good he may do, St. Augustine will tell of him, “Thou runnest well, but out of the way!” That is, out of the way in which God has called you to walk for obtaining salvation. The Lord does not accept  the sacrifices offered up to him from our own inclination, but to Cain and his offerings He had no respect (Gen. 4.5). Rather He threatens with great chastisement [and why they invented a “New ‘Catholic [t]heology’” – a NEW theo [Gk: god]: a god who knows no just wrath and is the object of a “New Rite of Worship” or the “New ‘M[e]ss’” which the perverted lying Superior-General of the mainstream-SSPX formally claims to have been “legitimately promulgated” by Paul VI]  those who, when He calls them, turn their backs on Him in order to follow the whims of their own caprice. Woe to you apostate children, He says through the Prophet Isaias, that you would take counsel and not from Me, and would begin a web and not by My spirit (30.1).

A blessed Feast to everyone!

Kindly offer an Ave Maria for Friar John Marie-Therese, our Discalced Carmelite of Catholic Resistance who has been approved to ascend to the Diaconate. Deo gratias!


Posted in Christian Life, Doctrinal Instructions, Sacred Scriptures, Traditional Roman Catholic Order | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What it takes to become a Carmelite Saint


Feast of All the Saints of Carmel

… By their examples and merits, [may we] live for Christ Crucified alone in meditation of the yoke of His law and in perfect abnegation… (taken from the Collect)

My son, give me your [whole] heart: and let thy eyes keep My ways: if anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me (Pr. 23.26; Mt. 16.24).

But the generously staunch heart of a Teresian Carmelite, beating after the Heart of the Immaculate Mother and Queen of Carmel, would not be content to take up his cross and merely follow the Beloved after – “Be always ready to take the place of the Beloved!” (St. Teresa of Jesus).

A blessed Feast to everyone!

See also: “Decor Carmeli” (The Beauty of Carmel)Teresian Carmelite Vocation Discernment – I: The Queenship of Mary, and The (Traditional) Teresian Carmel. Related: The Measure of Loving God 


Posted in Christian Life, Teresian Carmelite Spirituality | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Truth – the hard and narrow way to God.


Master, we know that Thou… teachest the way of God in truth.
(from today’s Holy Gospel,  Mt. 22.16)

Jesus teachingThe Jews not only knew that it is the truth that sets man to his course back to temporal sanity and eternal happiness but, moreover, heard the truth in its overwhelming splendor from no other than the Lord Jesus Christ, calling Him Master. But they not only loved not the Truth, they even dared kicked hard against the goad (Ac. 9.5).

There used to be only the Mohammedans and “’Bible’-only” self-proclaimed ‘messengers’ most zealous in pretending to be the teachers on and guides in the way to God but less than the truth – self –contradiction: they say, on the one hand, they constitute to be the teacher and guide and yet, on the other, maintain that it is the ’Book’. Now, they are joined by the occupants of “the Chair of the Truth” (Pope Leo XIII in his long Prayer to St. Michael) but who were schooled in the error of Neo-Catholicism – ecumenical union in diversity (no longer the Catholic union in the Truth – same language and sense of doctrine; same Sacramental expression of the Truth; and, same manner of submission to its Sovereign arbiter and teacher here on earth – the Catholic Pontifex Maximus (the Sovereign Pontiff crowned with the Papal tiara – Vicar of the King of kings and Lord of lords). And if they boast of a large and statistically growing number of followers, it is because they are the instrument of God’s curse to men who daily fall out in great numbers with the love of the truth. And in all seduction of iniquity to them that perish; because they receive not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. Therefore God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying… (2 Thess. 2.10). “I encourage you to make a treasure of this [Modernist] rich experience and to continue with courage, always attentive to the signs of the times and asking the Lord for the gift of mutual listening and docility to His will” (the Antipope Bergoglio – cf., our post on the anomaly in the “Declaratio” of resignation read by Pope Benedict XVI – in his address to the “33rd Ecumenical Meeting of Bishops, Friends of the Fokolare Movement” which he described in the diabolical fashion as “an expression, fruit of what the love of the Word of God [the Truth*] produces,” in Zenith Report of 8th November 2014).

* But the Word of God condemns the “’Bible’-only ‘Churches’” who refuse to hear the [Roman] Church – and pretend to ‘read the Bible’ (itself not anywhere written!) being their standard of the truth – with the lot of the devil whom the heathen and publican (Mt. 18.17) that they are serve and partakers with (1 Cor. 10.20).

“… Experience,” the truth for the Modernist. “Docility to His will,” yes but this is denied by “mutual listening” with the partisans of the ancient deceiver – as with the rest of stupid pretenders referred to above, standing on self-contradiction. “Asking the [l]ord for the gift of mutual listening…,” it is the crime of diabolical presumption to expect from God an exercise of divine powers for the perdition of souls and the glorification of the devil; it is sheer blasphemy against the Holy Ghost to attribute to Him a ‘gift’ only the devil has the power to communicate – and that to his followers alone.

Let us not be deceived.

Posted in Christian Life, Sacred Scriptures, Traditional Roman Catholic Order, Vatican II mock-Catholic Religion | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Satanic Synod”


Feast of All the Saints

All Saints

The assembly of the just, the kingdom of God, was redeemed by the Most Precious Blood of Our Divine Savior (from The Roman Breviary) and they stand before the throne of God clothed with white robes and palms in their hands (Apoc. 7.9). But the so-called ‘Roman Synod’ of the Vatican II Neo-Catholic [Dis-]Order emerged with the stinking black robe of the Antipope with his diabolical effeminate sway in their hands.

“Satanic Synod”

(Fr. F. Chazal, SSPX-Marian Corps)

Vatican III is already upon us, at the hands of the self styled “synodal pope”. It was textbook revolution. A repeat of what we read in Ralph Wiltgen’s “the Rhine flows into the Tiber”, to the exception that the Plata river has joined the rhine, and the rearguard is Polish, African, and from some other isolated places. Conservative elements were allowed to show their token complaints, adding a more open and pluralistic debate to take place, but the truth that comes from below has to prevail. The [mainstream] Church is turning gay, divorcish, and morally gradual: that is the reality that takes place and such reality in turn becomes official. Vatican II says the Church is the People of God, [Bergoglio] just applies this principle. The train is leaving, now if conservatives like Fr. Nely [of the compromised mainstream-SSPX and Second Councilor to the Neo-SSPX perverted Superior-General] are not interested, they can step down, but they can stay and endeavor to persevere…

The reality we are facing now in the conciliar church is even worse than we were expecting of this Synod so called “on the family” with the inimaginable pretense that the right of little children are going to be respected, while throwing them in homosexual couples [claiming that these perverts have something 'good' to contribute to 'Catholic' families!], with all the depravities that this alone entails, and with all the abominations taking place with surrogate mothers, (IVF, ie, plenty of abortions, eugenics, trafficking, abuse on third world women etc.). And how can you be in favor of the family while condoning so openly divorce, for the first time in the History of a Church who lost one of its most powerful nations, just on the question of the divorce of one man, Henry VIII?

Gradualism means that if you sin, and plan to sin further, as long as you are in the process of hoping to do something about it, you are accepted, nay welcomed. You are just a prisoner of your own device, we ll help you along as you are, and where you are, either on the gay planet, or on the lefebvrian planet. We are all pilgrims of truth said Pope Benedict to the Lutherans.

Typically, the president of the Polish Episcopal Conference stated that this was a departure from the teachings of Pope John Paul II. The most controversial paragraphs were turned down temporarily, and by a whisker (64% voted in favor of the text on homosexuals, some voted against because there was not enough for them). So [Bergoglio] maintained the infamous paragraphs and the whole text of the “Relatio post disceptationem” remains open for public debate until next year, sayeth mgr Forte, the special secretary, and it is the Pope who has the final say. Note well that these infamous paragraphs fell short of the two third majority but got always a comfortable absolute majority. It will pass easily in the second round, and [Bergoglio] is clearly telling that those against are pharisees who will have to obey the “God of surprises”.

The mentor of {Bergoglio] is more Paul VI than Pope John Paul II, a Pope that showed his ability to face down people of the past to impose the new ‘aggiornamento’. Just like in Vatican II, if the necessary votes are not gathered, the whole matter is thrown again in successive rounds of debate until it passes with faint conservative amendments.

What matters is that the new ideas get floated for the first time in the full view of the world with the endorsement [by] the supreme authority of the Catholic Church speaking and acting as if it were the instrument of Satan [Get thee behind Me, Satan! – Our Lord to Peter] . Opposition is allowed to swing in its turn, only to be defeated and chopped into the weaker recyclable half … ones, who get taken care of later like the good old ex-SSPX.

Note the conservative types thrown at us like Cardinal Muller who stated that the Virginity of Our Lady is not a physical reality, or Cardinal Napier who says the text is incomplete because it should allow communion to polygamists as well. Consrvatives of Vatican III match perfecly the ultra liberals of Vatican II. In any case, many voters did not approve the controversial paragraphs for reasons of procedure only, and not of content. The whole thing is totally teleguided from the start, including the conservative opposition to it. It was the [Neo-Catholic 'Pontifex'] who appoints the moderators of the Synod and chooses its members at every consistory of Cardinals,removing the old, and promoting the surprises. The [Neo-Catholic 'President'] orders the demagogic polls and stirs the pot by his scandalous declarations ahead of the Synod. Are the conservatives shocked at the beatification of Paul VI? Well, they should follow the example of the conservative Pope Benedict XVI who duly attended the ceremony and endorsed it… isn’t he slated as number three for take off after the canonization of Paul VI, John-Paul I? And there will be plenty more of unsavory [dissimulating-]canonizations to swallow from now on.

Did those conservatives really believe that Revolution would stop? If they did it was useful of them to believe so, to recycle gradually reactionnary elements, but now the horses of Mephysto have to gallop further. All along they are made part of the revolutionary process that needs opposition to keep not just some spice in the debate but a focus on its principles and needs always an enemy to position its weapons better, like “target designation” in warfare. There is only one last stop for Revolution, and it is Hell. You can check in any time you want, but you can never leave. So come and check into my train, any time you want sayeth Bergoglio!”

A blessed Feast to everyone!

Posted in Christian Life, Vatican II mock-Catholic Religion | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Conquest for the devil


Feast of Christ the King

Christ the King

The Holy Church prays today that “all the kindred of the nations… may be brought under the sweet yoke” of the rule and dominion of Christ the King since God “hast willed to restore all things” in Him through His Son Our Lord Jesus Christ. And see how could she be distinguished in her prayer, nay the Spirit of Truth pleading in her, from the desire of the pseudo-Church of infiltrated Freemasons and Communists (cf., our post “The Year 1929”) to accommodate itself to the phenomenological ‘situation’ and the Modernist ‘experience’ of de-Christianized perverted man as it was reflected in the last so-called ‘Roman Synod’  – the true holy Catholic Church, purified down to the prophesied Resistance remnant, acknowledges the one same old problem underlying all the upheavals of the ‘Modernist’ de-Catholicized man: the division in and around him “by the wound of sin” (Collect of today’s Mass) with its concomitant rotten stench of the basest moral perversions.

God the Father… hath made us worthy to be partakers of the lot of the Saints in light (from today’s Lesson, Col. 1.12-20). The diabolical “Vatican II-Church” of dissimulation pretends to draw the ‘Modern’ man, especially the perverts, to the Catholic fold yet makes a mockery of the light – dismissing the Traditionalt insistence on the fundamental of dogmatic truth as “hostile inflexibility” (the Antipope Bergoglio) and challenging God to His face for His being the sole and final arbiter of good and evil, opposed as He would ever be to the invention of an ‘opinionated egalitarian free/liberal man’ of today inebriated by the 1789 Masonic poison of the ‘Rights of Man’: ‘there’s nothing wrong in me; I am not wounded by sin ; and, I cannot be a miser living in sin” – pressed to its logical conclusion: he did not need the salvation offered by God through the Crucified… making peace through the Blood of His Cross, both as to the things on earth, and the things that are in heaven.

Nothing definitive actually came out of the so-called ‘Synod’ but one thing is conclusive – in the mindset of the pseudo-Church ‘president’, the Antipope Bergoglio, ‘the way, the truth, and the life’ of the ‘modernist effeminate man’ in his situation and experience hold the primacy… in all things; not the irrevocable rights and judgment of the King of kings and Lord of lords thundering from the Cross. This is the true Catholic conquest of souls under the banner of the Crucified and the Immaculata. Let us resist the Antipope and his pseudo-Church in their mad conquest for the devil whose 100-year permission is now drawing fast to its terrible close.

A most blessed Feast to everyone!

Posted in Christian Life, Devotions, Doctrinal Instructions, Sacred Scriptures, The Blessed Virgin Mary, Traditional Roman Catholic Order, Vatican II mock-Catholic Religion | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pseudo-Neo-Catholic Church of Vatican II Betrays Its Self-Destruction


Solemn Feast of La Madre Teresa of Jesus
Virgin and Reformer of the Carmelite Order

St. Teresa of Jesus“… Reflect,” says St. Teresa of Jesus, “on the great damage parents do by not striving that their children might always see virtuous deeds of every kind” (Life, Ch. II).  But what more of parents who consent to their gay children in abandoning themselves into “the basest moral depravity” (St. John Chrysostom in our post, “Our Lady, Vatican Disorientation, and the Annihilation of Many Nations“) there is which even the dumbest beast would not dare venture in, beholden as it is to the Natural Law not by reason but by mere instinct! And they deserved a warm applause by the so-called ‘Roman Synod’ patres under the ‘presidency’ of the greatest jerk-antipope (why Bergoglio is not the true Pope: on the anomalous “Declaratio” of ‘resignation’ read by Pope Benedict XVI) there ever was! That the ‘Synod’ now welcome homosexuals abominably living together with children being raised by them should no longer be a surprise. This should unequivocally speak of how far the ‘official’ institutional mainstream Neo-Catholicism (the “pseudo-[Catholic] Church” of infiltrated Freemasons and Communists, cf., our post “The Year 1929” and “A Perilous ‘Catholic’ Voyage”) has already gone beyond redemption, its remedy being but its extirpation from the face of the earth by God’s direct intervention (cf., our post “The Chastisement Closes In”; see also “On the Number of Sins Beyond Which God Pardons No More”).

According to the measure in which the love of God takes possession of our heart, it creates and nourishes in us an ever increasing love for our neighbor; but this love, being supernatural, seeks only the supernatural good of our fellow men and thus becomes zeal for the salvation of souls.

All that God does is also for man’s eternal good and therefore for man’s eternal happiness. But we should long to have some share in this action, knowing that we can do nothing which will be more pleasing to God than to lend our humble collaboration for the salvation of those who are so dear to Him – not for their eternal misery in hell with the devils.

Zeal for souls finds its source in the contemplation of Christ and Him Crucified (1 Cor. 1.23; 2.2) – in distinction to the Neo-Christ of Vatican II’s Neo-Catholic THEOlogy whom the bastard ‘Synod’ mentioned to be gazed at while they diabolically look into the destruction of the Church’s basic unit, the famil . His wounds, His Blood, the excruciating agony, all tell us how much God values souls and how dearly He loves them. But his love is unrequited – or, yes, requited yet with such utter mockery of God and of His Church.

Posted in Christian Life, Vatican II mock-Catholic Religion | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

“Shun the wiles of the devil…”


Feast of the Blessed Virgin Mary of the Holy Rosary


“Grant, we beseech Thee, O Lord, that Thy faithful may shun all the wiles of the devil…”
(Collect of the Mass, last Sunday, 17th after Pentecost)

“‪Catholic‬ Resistance“-‪‎ManilaPH Being Persecuted By Its Former Manila ‘Coordinatrix’-Benefactress

Let our PH friends and readers be warned against this impious woman and her ‘visionary’ group (with connections to the so-called ‪”God the Father Movement”‬) who’s been going bitterly against the Seminary Community, especially against the senior Seminarian who exposed and denounced her to Fr. Chazal who in turn upheld him. To help “get the whole picture” and thus to do away with the malicious lying intrigues of her and her party, we quote the official report —

“Mrs. [Basilisa, aka 'Julie'] Cordova’s madness sprung over mere suspicion on Fr. Pfeiffer’s having been sold to [an adverse] proposal [by a faithful who had a falling off with her] for our transfer. This was triggered when Fr. Pfeiffer, coming from Iloilo, contacted Fr. Suelo to go up to the airport in Manila for a meeting. Mrs. Cordova challenged the said arrangement arguing why Fr. Pfeiffer would rather not head straight here unless they wanted to go with William and see another possible site for the Seminary. I reproved her in that such arrangement between the Fathers is not even for her scrutiny and that she was already imputing ‘wrongdoing’ over mere suspicion. Her only reply was that she has yet to prove herself wrong whenever she would go with her inkling. She added, “If you leave, I would rather be happy but don’t expect me to follow them.”

When I informed her over the phone of Fr. Suelo’s plan of spending the night at her house in Malate for the next morning meet with Fr. Pfeiffer, it was she who rather “very rude[ly]” [to quote her partisan, Rommel dela Rosa] and contemptuously expressed how she would treat even sacred persons in conflict with her decision over her suspicion, saying angrily, “No! He is not welcome here. I am not going to accept him here. If he wants to meet with Pfeiffer, tell him to take an early morning ride there to the airport!” And when our entering Seminarian from Liloan, Leyte first met her, Mrs. Cordova’s opening salvo to him was, “Where will you stay now that I am expelling them from here?” [The incoming Seminarian] was taken aback, he “did not know what to say at her rudeness.” Now she had the gall to say, “I wonder what kind of formation and training your priests received,” and chide us for [being ungratefully disrespectful] over the following “need to be informed” thing even of matters and affairs proper only to an Ecclesiastical Superior of whom she is not :

In the afternoon of Fr. Pfeiffer’s meet with Fr. Suelo, he was able to get hold of Mrs. Cordova over the phone for a late afternoon or early evening Mass in Malate. However, Fr. Pfeiffer told me that it was turned down by Mrs. Cordova because the schedule was not convenient and in all possibility, only one could make it. Fr. Pfeiffer rang her up again to finally call it off altogether as he could not make it anymore besides. Many times did he dial up Mrs. Cordova’s numbers – both landline AND MOBILE – but she would not pick up though, as Father surmised, she could not be somewhere otherwise. Later in the evening, she sent me a text message to check whether both Fathers had already gone back here to Batangas because she called up faithful for the Mass and prepared food, then Fr. Pfeiffer did not show up “with no sms message sent and NO CALLS WHATSOEVER [lie];” her conclusion: “Fr. Pfeiffer would just like to get me embarrassed before the faithful.” Fr. Pfeiffer noted here a “battle plan” prepared by Mrs. Cordova against him for a division between you and him. It seems to me our Manila ‘Coordinatrix’ manipulated this affair to the discredit of Fr. Pfeiffer over, again, her suspicion.

Fr. Pfeiffer stayed with us for three days and one night. The third day, a Friday, he took us out to Makati after lunch. Mrs. Cordova came over after we had already left and complained that we did not inform her that we were going out – a couple of times, after the [adverse faithful] affair in which she was also accused of meddling in things which ecclesiastical norms forbid her to have a ‘say’ whatsoever notwithstanding her being a key benefactor, she declared to me that she has already let ["not give"] her house to be “the house of God;” now, if they say we are “bypassing” her [claims a partisan of her, Rommel dela Rosa] then what is demanded of us is not mere ‘courtesy information’ but, contrary to what she rhetorically demands, an obligation to report, as to a Seminary superior, for her consideration and regulation as she insolently insisted on with Fr. Pfeiffer-Fr. Suelo arrangement referred to previously. On this point, I challenged her, “So where do we put the demarcation line: where does ‘your house’ end and the house of God begin?” The clarification I gave her was if we were to use her house for other purpose other than a religious one or if we were to introduce modifications or changes in her property then we are not only bound to “inform her” but also to ask her permission. However, instead of coming down from the heights of her bloated pride and acknowledge that in truth she has no case over her imagined need to be “informed” of our strictly Seminary affairs and activities in and out, she’d rather save her face and proceeded, “If that’s the case, then you rent my house for PESOS 60,000 a month so that you can come and go as you please for this is still my house.” How rotten is her sense of ‘justice’ gone, thinking deludedly that with all the resources merely entrusted to her by Divine Providence she has been given with it a position with which she could insolently offer such a shamelessly impious insult to clerics who refused to bow down to her irreligious whim! And at that Sunday ‘meeting’ she hosted, a faithful named Ligaya remarked on her rental ‘threat’: “They will come then before you begging on their knees.” Interestingly, Mrs. Cordova added also last Friday to her rental ‘threat’, “Or, I may not allow anymore your Mass in my house” : in giving in to madness she would claim her nature is already used to, she does not know anymore what exactly is the ‘penalty’ for which. To continue, Father, the story on that Friday afternoon, I sent her a text message during our recreation to inform her that Fr. Pfeiffer would like to see her in Malate in the evening to which she replied, “Why did you show him my messages [in which she would refer to him no longer as Fr. Pfeiffer but as "JP" and imputed malice over Father's failed show-up]?” – I did not mind about showing them anymore in fact. So she knew well that she had gone overboard but then: when we finished our dinner late, I messaged her that Father would not be able to make it anymore as he needed to head straight to the airport; she it was who still managed to get the nerve of impudently replying, “Let him not show himself to me anymore.”

Later at night or already past midnight, I received a text message from her that some faithful were requesting the Sunday Mass be held in Malate and added, “since Fr. Suelo is fond of wandering out anyways” (Mrs. Cordova lied at the meeting she convoked below telling the attendees that Fr. Suelo was in Manila for three consecutive days amusing himself). The following morning, she sent again a text message informing me that already, “majority of the faithful [coincidentally] wanted to go home early after the Sunday Mass” – however, there are faithful who, when they needed to go home early, leave after the Mass and no longer stay for lunch with us. I insisted that the Mass be held in Batangas as Fr. Suelo needed rest in preparation for our weeklong-trip to Mindanao-Visayas missions with Fr. Pfeiffer which specific reason I did not mention to her anymore except that we need to prepare for it. On this, Mrs. Cordova mentioned to me last Friday that she and Mrs. Simon were wondering what things would take us for a preparation that denied the request of her coordinating ‘office’. So she implies that our considerations in administering the sacred be scrutinized by them and if it seems ‘unreasonable’ to them… please refer to the end of this paragraph, Father. Mrs. Cordova thought, and rightly, that it must be me who decided to have the Mass here because “Fr. Suelo will not say no.” That, in connection with her “since…” in the text message above, showing again her contemptuous attitude against a priest whom they consider to be, in the terms [the adverse faithful above] first referred to Fr. Elijah, ‘DRAGgable’ (‘kaladkarin’ in local idiom), was the second reason why I denied her request. Then, Mrs. Cordova also did not go down anymore that Sunday morning. Interestingly, [a faithful young man] informed me that Mrs. Cordova called him to a meeting in her house that same Sunday morning and the meeting even lasted until the afternoon – “need to go home early?” A faithful, who asks not to be named, notified me by email that over phone conversation with Mrs. Cordova early that same Sunday afternoon, among other things she was griping about, she ‘threatened’, “If they cannot follow our requests, they can now get out of there!”

Mrs. Cordova came down also last Friday with Ms. Matti, the ‘visionary’, and two others [Susan Tempra, and a lady named Telen] who form her group. Ms. Matti’s piece: we were “disrespectful” towards our host-benefactor in following Fr. Pfeiffer. And when she said, “Yes, Fr. Pfeiffer is the Superior BUT DOES HE PROVIDE FOR YOU HERE…,” I challenged her also “to [her] face” (Gal. 2.11) for this deluded proud spirit would rather have a benefactor’s whim be given preference [than true Catholic obedience to a legitimate Superior]. Taking what she erroneously considers to be of weightier matter, I called them to account: what comparison is there between what they’re boasting of and a single Mass offered for them. They have forgotten that whatever it is they are boasting of now is nothing before God and that God reduces to nothing all our proud works. But it seems it did not matter to them for when [the faithful young man] asked Mrs. Cordova during the meeting she convoked, “to whom will you go for Mass and other Sacraments” given that we all are now worthless before their eyes (Ms. Matti zeroed in also your two-month absence as tantamount to abandoning your seminarians – the ‘visionary’ failed to ‘see’ so I tried to enlightened her regarding the circumstances of our canonical vacation), the ‪Sedevacantist‬ CMRI came up but since the said Sedevacantists refuse to go here and would refer them instead to Fr. Soliman whom they do not ‘like’, the ‘visionary’ spoke thus, “we were told that if there are no more priests to whom we should go, then we can already go straight to [g]od…” – the ‘spirit’ behind Protestantism. And so she continued, this time taking it out on Fr. Suelo (who defied Mrs. Cordova in going up still to Manila to meet with Fr. Pfeiffer) according to the complaints of Fr. Onoda which, she claimed, she learned from a woman who inquired with the mainstream-‪SSPX‬ OLVC Prior for his whereabouts. The ‘visionary’ would like us to ‘see’ that Fr. Suelo is a great financial liability if we leave Mrs. Cordova’s house and that since, according to Fr. Onoda, he is a recalcitrant subordinate he is as good as dumped. So, to shut her up and finally end the discussion with them, I remarked: “St. Teresa said: ‘Even if a priest be a sinner, I will still kiss his footsteps.’ Dump your clerics when they turn apostates, heretics, schismatics but not because you perceive them as ‘offending’ your ‘righteous’ sensibilities. And as to our renting out or not this house or to the discontinuance of the Mass here, and as to your murmurings against our decisions on the administration of the sacred and on our getting in and out of the Seminary, let Fr. Chazal settle it.”

Later in the afternoon, Mrs. Cordova went all the way through in perpetrating in the Seminary cloister even up to our rooms (except Fr. Suelo’s which, I was told by our lady-helpers, was locked) their superstitious ritual of swinging incense to drive away, in her proud presumption, the remaining evil spirits who, she claimed, came with [the adverse faithful] and who now have been taking hold of us so that we finally get ‘enlightened’! She was an ex-[‪Augustinian Recollect‬]nun and claiming to be ‘traditional’ she must know that that kind of shameless irreverent stupidity cannot pass without them having incurred a canonical punishment [it is our lady-helpers who rather have a Catholic sense for they dreaded that such forbidden absurdity occured; they believe that God will punish them for it]. And in virtue of the Order of Porter conferred upon me, shall I bar those impiously deluded proud spirits from sacred ceremony until we see them “begging [pardon and absolution] on their bended knees?” The ‘visionary’, I was told, then claimed that she saw the remaining proud spirits scampering away – I recall her relating one time that when she saw devils surrounding a mainstream-SSPX priest at an airport where she happened to be waiting, she ran away out of fear for them: but St. Therese also saw devils and these proud spirits were the ones who scampered away from her trembling; according to St. Teresa, if we pray well we can not be fearful of devils. Mrs. Cordova and party left taking away with them the red and green vestments which came from Mrs. [Babes Simon].

The following day, during lunch, I was told that they expected me to just sit down before them keeping mum while Mrs. Cordova and the ‘visionary’ were spewing the same impious murmurings with which they have already maliciously intrigued with other faithful, and then of course “beg [for their indulgence] on bended knees.” But sorry for them last Friday, I did not – and will not! They forgot that a cleric sitting before them occupies a position higher than what they pretend to be and a Porter of the “house of God” would not tolerate their shamelessly impudent and impious mouths in dealing with and speaking of us so I refuted and reproved them accordingly. One of them commented to our lady-helpers, “He hasn’t become a priest yet, what more…” To which I would reply: What more if I become a priest? I will deal just as God dealt severely with proud murmurers as of Old” [emphases, ours with those supplied in the original].

Fr. Chazal decided to abandon the woman’s house and appointed 8th of September for the Community’s transfer. He tasked the senior Seminarian to take charge of the transfer as he would be away for the scheduled Korea-Japan mission run and instructed to “save whatever you can [that is liturgically necessary for the Seminary].” However, later in the day, the impious woman charged the senior Seminarian in the local community blotter with ‘theft’ formally claiming that the altar cross, sanctuary images of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart, the tabernacle, censer, ciborium, and missal stand received by the Superior as donations “all belong to [her]” while later would circulate text messages to the effect that she was actually trying to get even for the adverse effect of the Seminarian’s report on her repute in that “he was wrong in going against a tiger.” Her impious claim was a lie for her means of demanding back what “belong[s] to [her]” was by harassment of the weak and poor (she’s an ‘effeminate’ “tiger” after all with tail actually tucked in between hind legs!) – her poor tenants who served the Community and even offered help to the Seminary to get a temporary house and thus make the priests and seminarians stay near them were threatened with outright expulsion from her property had they failed to get everything she specified on her demand note! This coward also instructed her tenants to noise abroad that the Community – especially the senior Seminarian – were ‘thieves’; but, when the locals of the subdivision learned of what she did, only then did they know that she was actually a “rotten lying hypocrite” – a neighbor active in the Novus Ordo parish denounced her with loathing to the N.O. “presider”. Well, these N.O. devoted faithful exhibited themselves to be in possession still, somehow, of sound Catholic sense than this impudent deluded woman who claimed before the Resistance priests and seminarians that she saw the ‘Blessed Virgin’ one time in her property during the first marriage for the ResistancePH – but only the devil would have this kind of impious effect of her deceitful ‘apparition’! And to buttress her allegation that she was robbed, she now has resorted to a lie: that her house was only for her ‘retreat house’ and not a seminary.

The next morning after the transfer, the ‘effeminate’ “tiger” instructed the chief of the local community police to demand also from the Seminarian the chalice bought by Fr. Pfeiffer with a threat that the local community police would cross beyond their area of jurisdiction and extend their arms on behalf of the political ‘corruptrix’. The Seminarian challenged them to come up rather with a rightful court order from which the deluded impious spirit backed off for she would not be able to present to the court any evidence proving that Fr. Pfeiffer’s chalice “belongs to [her].”

Fr. Chazal, over a phone conversation with his senior Seminarian, claimed that that deluded woman was actually the one “robbing” the community and since what she was able to get back by harassment were devoted to the sanctuary and the altar the ‘effeminate’ “tiger” “committed,” continued Fr. Chazal, “ABOMINATION.” The Church, according to St. Pius X-Pope Benedict XV Code of Canon Law, punishes her and her partisans who urged her and would defend her impious usurpation of ecclesiastical property with EXCOMMUNICATION LATAE SENTENTIAE - that is, AUTOMATIC EXCOMMUNICATION – and its absolution reserved to the Holy See (good ‘luck’ to her and her partisans with the present “diabolical disorientation” of Rome).

Posted in Christian Life | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

“Fire will fall from heaven…” – The Great Chastisement Closes In


First Saturday of the Month


Father Constant Louis Marie PEL (1876–1966) is not a name well-known among the souls gifted by God with a knowledge of how God is going to set today’s world straight, but for those who knew him he was a priest very close to God. Doctor in theology, seminary professor, founder of a convent for women and of a seminary for men, with a great devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, he was a personal friend of Padre Pio who said of him to some French pilgrims in San Giovanni Rotondo, “Why do you come to see me when you have so great a Saint in France?”

Fr Pel would spend nights on his feet in church with his forehead leaning against the Tabernacle, conversing with God in a permanent ecstasy. He died in a car accident just after Vatican II, but not before a seminarian, one of his spiritual sons, had been able to note down a prophecy of his, dating from 1945, concerning the chastisement which will strike France in particular. Here it is, quoted or abbreviated:–

“My son,” said Fr Pel, “know that with the sins of the world increasing in horror as this age wears on, great punishments from God will come down on the world and no continent will be spared by the Wrath of God. France being guilty of apostasy and denying its vocation will be severely chastised. East of a line stretching from Bordeaux in the south-west to Lille in the north-east, everything will be laid waste and set on fire by peoples invading from the east, and also by great flaming meteorites falling in a rain of fire upon all the earth and upon these regions especially. Revolution, war, epidemics, plagues, chemical poison gases, violent earthquakes and the re-awakening of France’s extinct volcanoes will destroy everything . .

“France to the west of that line will be less affected . . . because of the faith rooted in the Vendée and in Brittany . . . but any of God’s worst enemies seeking refuge there from the worldwide cataclysm will be found out, wherever they hide, and put to death by devils, because the Wrath of the Lord is just and holy. Thick darkness caused by the war, gigantic fires and fragments of burning stars falling for three days and nights will cause the sun to disappear, and only candles blessed on Candlemas (February 2) will give light in the hands of believers, but the godless will not see this miraculous light because they have darkness in their souls.

“In this way, my son, three quarters of mankind will be destroyed, and in certain parts of France survivors will have to go 60 miles to find another live human being . . . . Several nations will disappear off the face of the map . . . . A France thus purified will become the renewed “Eldest Daughter of the Church,” because all the Cains and Judases will have disappeared in this ‘Judgment upon the Nations’”. This Judgment is not yet the end of times, but so great is the punishment due to the sins of the nations that Our Lord told Fr Pel that the desolation at world’s end will be lesser.

Dear readers, what do we conclude? Let each of us strive with might and main, and with the help of the true Catholic sacraments (go to our “Catholic Resistance” Mass centers) given to us by God for that purpose, to live in God’s grace and not in the state of sin, and let us make full use of the time he gives us between now and the Hour of his Justice to pray for the largest possible number of sinners to repent and save their souls for eternity when the Chastisement closes in. God, have mercy. Mary, help.

Kyrie eleison.
Bishop R. Williamson

See also: “Our Lady, Vatican II Disorientation, and the Annihilation of Many Nations

Posted in Christian Life, The Blessed Virgin Mary | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Our delightful wound in God’s Heart


Feast of Our Dear “Little Therese”
Virgin of the Order of Our Lady of Mt. Carmel

Come from Libanus… thou hast wounded My Heart,
My sister, My spouse, thou hast wounded My Heart
(from the Introit of the Mass, Cant. 4,8,9).

Sacred Heart

The delightful wound with which God draws us to our rightful place in His Heart:

St. Therese

The Little Way of Spiritual Childhood of St. Therese – Humility (III)

A most blessed Feast to everyone!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Neo-Catholic ‘Pontifex’ at Loggerheads with the Eternal Word


Seventeeth Sunday after Pentecost

“Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with thy whole heart… – this is THE greatest and the first commandment.” The un-Catholic ‘Pontifex’ in his address to the Focolare Movement last Friday (26 Sept), muddled contemplation at the foundation of its edifice and thereby spoiled its crown – pseudo-contemplation of the pseudo-Catholic Religion. He claims: “Today we have more need than ever to contemplate God and the wonders of His love, to dwell in Him, who in Jesus came to pitch His tent among us. To contemplate means, MOREOVER, to live in the company of brothers and sisters, to break with them the BREAD OF COMMUNION and fraternity…” (ZenitNews). The antipope (cf., our post on the anomaly in the ‘Declaratio’ of ‘resignation’ by Pope Benedict XVI: “Sagittam Electam – I“) contradicts the Eternal Word in the passage quoted above by falsifying the precept thus: “MOREOVER” – ‘It is our Vatican II Neo-Catholic ecumenical ‘fraternity’ with men of all contradicting creeds and persuasions that is actually the first and the greatest;’ also, falsifying Charity with his ecumenical ‘fraternity’ condemned of Old and again by St. Paul the Apostle (cf., 2 Cor. 6.15). Do not be deceived: For there shall arise… false prophets… insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect (Mt. 24.24).

Posted in Christian Life, Sacred Scriptures, Traditional Roman Catholic Order, Vatican II mock-Catholic Religion | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment