We charge you, brethren, In the Name of Our Lord Jesus Christ, that you WITHDRAW YOURSELVES FROM THEM WHO WALK DISORDERLY, AND NOT ACCORDING TO THE TRADITION which they have received of us (II Thess. 3.6)
We cannot pursue a course of disobedience – for in principle it is the way of the perverted proud spirit. However, ‘obedience’ to ‘superiors’ is not an absolute end: our Holy Father and the Bishops in true communion with him received grace and apostleship for obedience to the Faith as St. Paul teaches (Rom. 1.5). Accordingly, when the Prince of the Apostles in his episode of exhibiting grave public scandal – his dissimulation (Gal. 2.13) – threatened the integrity of the Faith, St. Paul PUBLICLY RESISTED him. I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed (Gal. 2.11).
We are not then in “open/formal disobedience” but in “licit” Catholic Resistance. If there were in truly, really, and formally* “open disobedience” TO THE VOICE OF CHRIST (which is the ultimate and absolute end of Catholic obedience to legitimate superiors) reflected through the CONSISTENT teachings and judgments of the Chair of Peter they are the great number (MANY…, cf., Mt. 7.22) of Neo-Catholic pastors who persist in a scheme of things other than the Order constituted by God under the sovereign dominion of Christ the King.
“….The Roman Pontiff… may nonetheless be contradicted if he be found to have deviated from the Faith. Remembering also that, where danger is greater, it must more fully and more diligently be counteracted… lest We seem to be dumb watchdogs [cf., Is. 56.10] that cannot bark and lest We perish with the wicked husbandman and be compared with the hireling” (Pope Paul IV, “Cum ex…,” 15 Feb. 1559)
The Word of God is LIVING and effectual, and more piercing than any two-edged sword (Heb. 4.12). Thus, the episodes wherein Our Lord gravely rebuked Peter, Go behind Me, Satan, thou art a scandal unto Me; because thou savourest not the things that are of God, but the things that are of men (Mt. 16.23) and Peter wandered afar off (Mt. 26.58: Jn. 19.26-27) the foot of the Cross can not be considered to be frozen “historical narratives” as the Neo-Catholic authorities would have us. They have been repeated in history. But we’d rather stay at the foot of the Cross than wander afar off with Peter (cf., “Wither goest thou… Peter?”, “A Perilous ‘Catholic’ Voyage”, “What Is Truth?”, “Pope Benedict XVI’s ‘Motu Proprio’ on the Latin Mass: ‘Toleration [of EVIL]'”, “Obey God Rather Than Men”, “Our Lady and the Disorientation of Rome in the 1960s”). We pray, however, that he, soon, returns – that is, that he desist in pursuing the ecumenical disorientation of search for that elusive ‘church’ which he (as Cardinal Ratzinger) claimed to be “a broader entity THAN the Catholic Church” (cf., “Our Lady and the New Orientation in Rome in the 1960s”) and exercise his Sovereign Apostolic Authority to finally exorcise “the smoke of Satan” (Pope Paul VI, cf., “Our Lady and the Diabolical Campaign”) that has seized the Sanctuary and institutions of the Church, to depose the “mock-prelates-and-priests” infiltrated by the Synagogue of Satan (Apoc. 2.9;3.9) through its dummies (the Freemasons and the Communists, cf., “Anti-Christian Conspiracy: Scriptural Truth & Historical Fact”, “A Perilous ‘Catholic’ Voyage”, “The Year That Was 1929”, and “Upheaval”), and to destroy the Neo-Catholic “table,” upon which is offered the abomination of desolation (Mt. 24.15), that is, the “Novus Ordo Missae” or the “New ‘M[e]ss'” of the Freemason Annibale Bugnini (cf., “The Catholic Sanctuary… II”), and ‘sanctuary’ dedicated to the false Christ of the Neo-Catholic ‘Theology’ (cf., “The Ultimate Delusion of Vatican II ‘Catholicism'”).
Related link: “Against Sedevacantism“.